Jason Wilson, Roberta Baer and Seiichi Villalona are pleased to announce publication of our article in Academic Medicine which highlights the success we have had implementing a premed patient shadowing program that builds in a patient experience perspective into the preclinical years at the University of South Florida. The article is available for free at the Academic Medicine website.
Patient shadowing early in training allows a shift in the clinical gaze that pays off in the long game in the development of future physicians
Presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology
(TH-160) THURSDAY 5:30-7:20, April 6, 2018
CHAIR: WILSON, Jason (TGH, USF)
A gap exists between patient and provider expectations during healthcare encounters in the United States. Those gaps are especially prevalent in acute clinical settings such as the emergency department where physicians have a defined agenda to rule out life threatening disease within a small amount of time usually with a patient they do not know from previous visits. Sometimes the underlying reason for the ER visit is emergent and sometime it is not, sometimes the underlying reason is medical and sometimes it is not.
Arthur Klieinman framed the patient-physician gap over 30 years ago as a difference in explanatory models of disease and illness. Medical anthropologists have focused on the tension between biomedical and lay person models of health. However, the patient experience, as measured by healthcare surveys of satisfaction, has not improved significantly and may be even worse in a setting of overcrowded department, confusing healthcare insurance issues, and disjointed attempts at continuity.
Attempts to measure the existing gap between an ideal patient experience and the current state were formalized by Irwin Press in the 1980s with the now ubiquitous utilization of the Press-Ganey Survey. However, just because a phenomenon is measured does not mean that the problem is resolved.
Hospitals spend millions to improve the patient experience, or at least to improve scores on patient satisfaction surveys. Those scores are now tied to reimbursement and the proportion of reimbursement related to those scores will only increase for providers and facilities moving forward.
What do hospitals get for all of this spending on patient satisfaction? Essentially everyone achieves mediocrity. The spread around the mean of these scores is incredibly tight. Moving from 83% to 85% might move you from the 50th percentile to the 90th percentile. The first large spend on patient experience by healthcare facilities is to ensure 50th percentile – drop below that and you risk a loss of federal reimbursement. The goal, however, is to ultimately move above average since that is where the rewards for higher patient satisfactions scores exist. Thus, hospitals spend incredible amounts of money to improve a few percentage points but, as the score gets higher the ability to increase the score by another percent also becomes exponentially more expensive.
Four years ago, a medical anthropologist and an emergency medicine physician decided to approach this issue together by repositioning the role of medical anthropology education in the premedical school curriculum as well as to position medical anthropologists as the obvious human resource for a healthcare organization patient experience department. As an ER doc who also went through the same training as our current students are just embarking upon, it was important to me to provide access to shadowing and research opportunities but with enhanced student engagement.
The papers you will hear this afternoon arose from this ongoing work. In the spring of 2015, we designed and co-taught our first iteration of an undergraduate course for pre-medical students, ANT4970 Patient-Physician Interaction. Now on our third rendition, each semester students first spend time shadowing patients and developing a patientcentric lens early in medical training. Student also learn the importance of utilizing mixed-method approaches such as participant observation, semi-structured interviews and quantitative analysis of data, to address questions focused on improving the overall patient experience. This course has had a tremendous impact on undergraduate students who often cite the class as a life changing experience.
Many of those students are now in medical school and Roberta Baer, Seiichi Villalona and I are following them and examining the sustainability of their early patientcentric training as they move through their training. Many students stay with us to complete undergraduate honors theses and we have now expanded our work in the ED to also include anthropology graduate students conducting dissertation research. This approach allows us to position graduate students as experts in patient experience within our institution and also to provide early, sustainable, training in patientcentric care that will, hopefully, be sustained as these trainees become physicians. Ideally, the course can be scaled up to other institutions, positioning med anthro training as a crtical aspect of improving patient experience.
The ability to move a patient satisfaction score from the 50th percentile to the 90th percentile is expensive and difficult. Mainstream medical approaches focus on reinforcing techniques that improve the perception of time spent with the provider during an acute clinical encounter as well as enhanced customer service approaches adopted from customer service friendly business, such as luxury hotel chains and well known amusement parks.
However, the premise of the work you will hear today suggests that those experience improvements may only be possible if specific special populations are better understood and addressed in the ED. The variation in patient visits and patient satisfaction scores is not described in the current Press-Ganey database and might not be well captured in quantitative analysis of large datasets. That is why these papers are critical to advancing our understanding of the patient experience in the ED.
First, you will hear from Seiichi Villalona. Seiichi is a graduate student receiving an MA this semester and moving on to the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Jersey this fall. Seiichi’s work focused on the relationship between placement of patients in less-optimal areas of the ED, such as hallways, and how those circumstances effect the overall experience. Seiichi’s thesis work is on the use of medical interpreters which he conducted with both one of our ED residents as well as another presented today, Mery Yanez Yuncosa who completed her undergraduate honors thesis examining Spanish patients who receive variable translation services in the ED.
We will also here from another undergraduate student, Killian Kelly, who is planning to eventually move on to graduate school in anthropology and worked with us to develop a patientcentric generated expectations leaflet. In addition, we will hear from Carlos Osorno Cruz who completed his undergraduate degree in anthropology and stayed on in the Emergency Department to continue his work as a research assistant, focusing on ways to improve the care of patients with sickle cell disease patients in the ED. We will also hear from a PhD Student, Heather Henderson, who has recently completed her master degree work on the stigma of opioid addiction. Heather’s work focuses on the medicalization of opioid abuse and how we can work to decrease the marginalization of this population in the ED.
Each presenter will take up to 15 minutes and we will hold questions to the end. After the last presentation, Roberta Baer, the co-designer of this course and these efforts will join us and we will conduct a 15-20 minute discussion and Q&A.
“I was in the hallway the entire time that I was being treated. I do understand that the ER was very busy and I am appreciative that I was seen and treated but I felt invisible most of the time that I was being treated even though I was visible to everyone that walked past. I did not even have a screen up around me and at one point the screen beside my gurney was taken to use for someone else. I do not think I would have minded so much if I would have been asked if I wanted it to be used for me first.” -58 year old female
“Nurses were sitting in station talking about personal matters. I was left in the hallway feeling uncomfortable with other visitors passing by and not being informed of anything.” -57 year old female
YANEZ, Mery and VILLALONA, Seiichi (USF), WILSON, Jason (TGH, USF)
Non-medication approaches to pain management are critical contributions to clinical science. This JAMA interview lays out how 11 trials will be funded based on preliminary data showing possible benefit. While this interview and these trials are important, the focus, like most pain management related research is on chronic pain. Our work (foam rollers, movement, and TENS units) is beginning to focus on pain in the ED – a population most researchers have traditionally shied away from when testing non-medication analgesic approaches.
The Sacramento Kings leadership and ownership groups have remained patient while #blacklivesmatter and other concerned citizens do the right thing and voice their anger in response to violence and asymmetrical power of law enforcement.
Do these guys seem angry? If I shoot your loved one in the head, you are not going to peacefully protest in response…
there comes a time when the sidelines start to look a lot like the bench player for one of the teams…
“At least on a small scale, this study provides some evidence that music may help serve as an extra tool to help motivate someone to exercise more, which is critical to heart health,” Shami said in a conference statement.”
Statistically significant 10% improvement in exercise time and non-statistically significant 13% improvement in energy output.
The European Heart Rhythm Association has published an updated set of NOAC guidelines. When these guidelines were first published 2 years ago, they were really the most in-depth set of recommendations out there and went places that the FDA was too afraid to go (i.e actual advice!). Common questions are addressed – NOAC selection, drug-drug interactions, levels, renal function, time off of NOAC for procedure, reversal (adnexanet even gets an appearance now along with Idarucizumab!). You may not agree with all of these suggestions but they are at least a great starting place.
The full set of guidelines from EHRA 2018 are available but the best part of the guidelines are the tables and figures which appear below!